First Nations,  GERIATRICS,  PALLIATIVE CARE

Culturally Safe Palliative Care and Advance Care Planning (ACP) for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples

Definition

Culturally safe palliative care is care that is:

  • respectful
  • trauma-informed
  • relationship-based
  • community-centred
  • spiritually and culturally responsive

It recognises that experiences of illness, dying, grief, family, spirituality, and decision-making may differ significantly between communities and individuals.

The aim is:

  • “care with” rather than “care for”
  • supporting autonomy, kinship, Country, identity, and community connection
  • reducing fear, mistrust, and institutional trauma
  • improving dignity, trust, and culturally meaningful end-of-life care.

Why Culturally Safe Care Matters

Healthcare experiences occur within broader historical, social, and cultural contexts.

Many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples may associate healthcare systems with:

  • colonisation
  • forced removals
  • racism and discrimination
  • institutional trauma
  • family separation
  • deaths away from Country
  • exclusion from decision-making.

This may contribute to:

  • fear and mistrust of hospitals
  • delayed presentations
  • disengagement from healthcare
  • reluctance to discuss ACP or end-of-life care
  • distress regarding dying away from family or Country.

Culturally safe care aims to:

  • restore trust
  • preserve dignity and identity
  • reduce retraumatisation
  • support spiritual wellbeing
  • align care with patient, family, and community values.

Core Principles

PrincipleKey ComponentsExamples
Cultural safetyRespect identity, spirituality, trauma history, community structuresInvolve Aboriginal Liaison Officers; avoid stereotyping
Relationship-based care (“yarning”)Trust-building, listening, conversational approachLonger consultations; avoid rushed discussions
Shared decision-makingCollaborative care planning“What matters most to you?”
Family and kinship-centred careRecognise collective decision-makingInclude Elders and key kinship members
Connection to CountryRespect cultural/spiritual importance of CountrySupport return to Country if possible
Trauma-informed careRecognise effects of racism and institutional traumaAvoid coercive or paternalistic communication
Holistic carePhysical, emotional, spiritual, social, cultural wellbeingIntegrate symptom and spiritual support
Flexible communicationPlain language, culturally appropriate terminology“Planning ahead” rather than “advance directive”
Respect for Sorry BusinessAcknowledge mourning practices and sensitivitiesRespect requests regarding names/images of deceased persons
Continuity of careLong-term trusted relationshipsConsistent GP and community team involvement
Accessible careAddress transport, literacy, geographic barriersOutreach, telehealth, medication delivery

“Care With” Rather Than “Care For”

“Care For”

Traditional biomedical models may unintentionally:

  • prioritise institutional processes
  • position clinicians as authority figures
  • focus narrowly on disease
  • overlook family and community structures.

This may feel:

  • paternalistic
  • disempowering
  • culturally unsafe.

“Care With”

“Care with” emphasises:

  • partnership
  • collaboration
  • listening first
  • shared decision-making
  • recognising the patient and community as experts in their own lives and culture.

Practical examples:

Less HelpfulMore Culturally Safe
“This is the treatment plan.”“Let’s talk about what matters most to you.”
Clinician-led decisionsShared decisions
Disease-focusedPerson, family, culture, and spirit-focused
Rushed consultationsRelationship-building and yarning

Autonomy, Kinship, and Decision-Making

Autonomy may be relational and family-connected rather than purely individualistic. Decision-making may involve:

  • family
  • Elders
  • kinship systems
  • community consultation
  • spiritual obligations.

Important considerations:

  • avoid assumptions regarding “next of kin”
  • ask who should be involved in discussions
  • allow time for family consultation
  • recognise collective decision-making.

Helpful questions:

  • “Who are the important people involved in decisions?”
  • “Who would you like included in conversations?”
  • “Is there someone you trust to help make decisions if needed?”

Connection to Country

Country may represent:

  • spirituality
  • identity
  • ancestry
  • belonging
  • healing
  • family and cultural continuity.

Dying away from Country may be deeply distressing.

Consider:

  • preferred place of care
  • returning closer to home/community
  • outreach palliative care
  • transport barriers
  • cultural ceremonies and spiritual practices.

Helpful questions:

  • “Where do you feel safest and most comfortable?”
  • “Is being on Country important to you?”
  • “Are there cultural practices we should support?”

Communication Considerations

Principles

  • Build trust before sensitive discussions
  • Use active listening and yarning approaches
  • Ask permission before discussing prognosis or ACP
  • Use plain, gentle language
  • Avoid assumptions about beliefs or family structures
  • Allow silence and reflection
  • Check understanding safely
  • Involve trusted supports where appropriate.

Less Helpful vs More Culturally Safe Language

Less HelpfulMore Culturally Safe
“Terminal illness”“Serious sickness”
“End-of-life planning”“Planning ahead”
“Do you want resuscitation?”“What would matter most if health became very sick?”
“Who is next of kin?”“Who are the important people involved in decisions?”

Language Around Death and Dying

Direct discussion of death may be culturally sensitive or perceived as spiritually unsafe in some communities.

Preferred phrases may include:

PhraseMeaning / Context
Sorry BusinessMourning, funerals, cultural grieving obligations
Sad BusinessGrief and community mourning
Finishing upApproaching end-of-life
Final footsteps / footprintsEnd-of-life journey
Journey / pathwayIllness transition
Going back homeReturning to Country or ancestors
Going to the DreamingSpiritual return connected to Dreaming beliefs

Using culturally appropriate language may:

  • reduce distress
  • improve trust
  • facilitate ACP discussions
  • improve engagement with palliative care services.

Advance Care Planning (ACP)

ACP should be:

  • gradual
  • relationship-based
  • flexible
  • culturally adapted
  • revisited over time.

Key Components

Explore Values and Goals

Discuss:

  • what matters most
  • cultural and spiritual priorities
  • preferred place of care
  • fears about illness or hospitalisation
  • quality of life goals.

Identify Decision-Makers

Clarify:

  • family spokespersons
  • substitute decision-makers
  • involvement of Elders/community supports.

Discuss Medical Preferences

Explore preferences regarding:

  • hospital vs home/community care
  • symptom management
  • resuscitation
  • transfer preferences
  • feeding/hydration
  • culturally important practices.

Document and Share Wishes

May include:

  • Advance Health Directive
  • Statement of Choices
  • other jurisdiction-specific ACP documentation.

Community Supports and Services

Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services (ACCHSs)

Examples include:

  • Institute for Urban Indigenous Health
  • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Community Health Service Brisbane

Services may provide:

  • Aboriginal Health Workers
  • outreach nursing
  • transport assistance
  • family support
  • social work
  • palliative care coordination.

Additional Supports

Support TypeExamples
TransportPatient travel schemes, community transport
Home supportMy Aged Care, HACC, NDIS
Carer supportCarers Queensland
EquipmentOxygen, hospital beds, mobility aids
Bereavement supportCommunity grief and spiritual support
OutreachRural and telehealth palliative services

Clinician Communication Tips

Helpful prompts include:

  • “What is most important to you right now?”
  • “Who would you like involved in decisions?”
  • “Are there cultural or spiritual practices we should respect?”
  • “Would support from Aboriginal Health Workers or Liaison Officers be helpful?”
  • “Where would you feel safest and most comfortable?”

Barriers Commonly Encountered

Common barriers include:

  • mistrust of healthcare systems
  • institutional racism
  • language barriers
  • remoteness
  • fragmented services
  • poor access to specialist palliative care
  • fear of dying away from Country
  • limited access to medications or equipment in remote areas.

Outcomes of Good Culturally Safe Care

Effective culturally safe palliative care may:

  • improve trust and engagement
  • improve symptom management
  • improve ACP uptake
  • reduce avoidable hospitalisations
  • improve quality of life
  • support culturally meaningful dying
  • improve bereavement experiences
  • reduce intergenerational trauma.

Key Resources

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.