Culturally Safe Palliative Care and Advance Care Planning (ACP) for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples
Definition
Culturally safe palliative care is care that is:
- respectful
- trauma-informed
- relationship-based
- community-centred
- spiritually and culturally responsive
It recognises that experiences of illness, dying, grief, family, spirituality, and decision-making may differ significantly between communities and individuals.
The aim is:
- “care with” rather than “care for”
- supporting autonomy, kinship, Country, identity, and community connection
- reducing fear, mistrust, and institutional trauma
- improving dignity, trust, and culturally meaningful end-of-life care.
Why Culturally Safe Care Matters
Healthcare experiences occur within broader historical, social, and cultural contexts.
Many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples may associate healthcare systems with:
- colonisation
- forced removals
- racism and discrimination
- institutional trauma
- family separation
- deaths away from Country
- exclusion from decision-making.
This may contribute to:
- fear and mistrust of hospitals
- delayed presentations
- disengagement from healthcare
- reluctance to discuss ACP or end-of-life care
- distress regarding dying away from family or Country.
Culturally safe care aims to:
- restore trust
- preserve dignity and identity
- reduce retraumatisation
- support spiritual wellbeing
- align care with patient, family, and community values.
Core Principles
| Principle | Key Components | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Cultural safety | Respect identity, spirituality, trauma history, community structures | Involve Aboriginal Liaison Officers; avoid stereotyping |
| Relationship-based care (“yarning”) | Trust-building, listening, conversational approach | Longer consultations; avoid rushed discussions |
| Shared decision-making | Collaborative care planning | “What matters most to you?” |
| Family and kinship-centred care | Recognise collective decision-making | Include Elders and key kinship members |
| Connection to Country | Respect cultural/spiritual importance of Country | Support return to Country if possible |
| Trauma-informed care | Recognise effects of racism and institutional trauma | Avoid coercive or paternalistic communication |
| Holistic care | Physical, emotional, spiritual, social, cultural wellbeing | Integrate symptom and spiritual support |
| Flexible communication | Plain language, culturally appropriate terminology | “Planning ahead” rather than “advance directive” |
| Respect for Sorry Business | Acknowledge mourning practices and sensitivities | Respect requests regarding names/images of deceased persons |
| Continuity of care | Long-term trusted relationships | Consistent GP and community team involvement |
| Accessible care | Address transport, literacy, geographic barriers | Outreach, telehealth, medication delivery |
“Care With” Rather Than “Care For”
“Care For”
Traditional biomedical models may unintentionally:
- prioritise institutional processes
- position clinicians as authority figures
- focus narrowly on disease
- overlook family and community structures.
This may feel:
- paternalistic
- disempowering
- culturally unsafe.
“Care With”
“Care with” emphasises:
- partnership
- collaboration
- listening first
- shared decision-making
- recognising the patient and community as experts in their own lives and culture.
Practical examples:
| Less Helpful | More Culturally Safe |
|---|---|
| “This is the treatment plan.” | “Let’s talk about what matters most to you.” |
| Clinician-led decisions | Shared decisions |
| Disease-focused | Person, family, culture, and spirit-focused |
| Rushed consultations | Relationship-building and yarning |
Autonomy, Kinship, and Decision-Making
Autonomy may be relational and family-connected rather than purely individualistic. Decision-making may involve:
- family
- Elders
- kinship systems
- community consultation
- spiritual obligations.
Important considerations:
- avoid assumptions regarding “next of kin”
- ask who should be involved in discussions
- allow time for family consultation
- recognise collective decision-making.
Helpful questions:
- “Who are the important people involved in decisions?”
- “Who would you like included in conversations?”
- “Is there someone you trust to help make decisions if needed?”
Connection to Country
Country may represent:
- spirituality
- identity
- ancestry
- belonging
- healing
- family and cultural continuity.
Dying away from Country may be deeply distressing.
Consider:
- preferred place of care
- returning closer to home/community
- outreach palliative care
- transport barriers
- cultural ceremonies and spiritual practices.
Helpful questions:
- “Where do you feel safest and most comfortable?”
- “Is being on Country important to you?”
- “Are there cultural practices we should support?”
Communication Considerations
Principles
- Build trust before sensitive discussions
- Use active listening and yarning approaches
- Ask permission before discussing prognosis or ACP
- Use plain, gentle language
- Avoid assumptions about beliefs or family structures
- Allow silence and reflection
- Check understanding safely
- Involve trusted supports where appropriate.
Less Helpful vs More Culturally Safe Language
| Less Helpful | More Culturally Safe |
|---|---|
| “Terminal illness” | “Serious sickness” |
| “End-of-life planning” | “Planning ahead” |
| “Do you want resuscitation?” | “What would matter most if health became very sick?” |
| “Who is next of kin?” | “Who are the important people involved in decisions?” |
Language Around Death and Dying
Direct discussion of death may be culturally sensitive or perceived as spiritually unsafe in some communities.
Preferred phrases may include:
| Phrase | Meaning / Context |
|---|---|
| Sorry Business | Mourning, funerals, cultural grieving obligations |
| Sad Business | Grief and community mourning |
| Finishing up | Approaching end-of-life |
| Final footsteps / footprints | End-of-life journey |
| Journey / pathway | Illness transition |
| Going back home | Returning to Country or ancestors |
| Going to the Dreaming | Spiritual return connected to Dreaming beliefs |
Using culturally appropriate language may:
- reduce distress
- improve trust
- facilitate ACP discussions
- improve engagement with palliative care services.
Advance Care Planning (ACP)
ACP should be:
- gradual
- relationship-based
- flexible
- culturally adapted
- revisited over time.
Key Components
Explore Values and Goals
Discuss:
- what matters most
- cultural and spiritual priorities
- preferred place of care
- fears about illness or hospitalisation
- quality of life goals.
Identify Decision-Makers
Clarify:
- family spokespersons
- substitute decision-makers
- involvement of Elders/community supports.
Discuss Medical Preferences
Explore preferences regarding:
- hospital vs home/community care
- symptom management
- resuscitation
- transfer preferences
- feeding/hydration
- culturally important practices.
Document and Share Wishes
May include:
- Advance Health Directive
- Statement of Choices
- other jurisdiction-specific ACP documentation.
Community Supports and Services
Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services (ACCHSs)
Examples include:
- Institute for Urban Indigenous Health
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Community Health Service Brisbane
Services may provide:
- Aboriginal Health Workers
- outreach nursing
- transport assistance
- family support
- social work
- palliative care coordination.
Additional Supports
| Support Type | Examples |
|---|---|
| Transport | Patient travel schemes, community transport |
| Home support | My Aged Care, HACC, NDIS |
| Carer support | Carers Queensland |
| Equipment | Oxygen, hospital beds, mobility aids |
| Bereavement support | Community grief and spiritual support |
| Outreach | Rural and telehealth palliative services |
Clinician Communication Tips
Helpful prompts include:
- “What is most important to you right now?”
- “Who would you like involved in decisions?”
- “Are there cultural or spiritual practices we should respect?”
- “Would support from Aboriginal Health Workers or Liaison Officers be helpful?”
- “Where would you feel safest and most comfortable?”
Barriers Commonly Encountered
Common barriers include:
- mistrust of healthcare systems
- institutional racism
- language barriers
- remoteness
- fragmented services
- poor access to specialist palliative care
- fear of dying away from Country
- limited access to medications or equipment in remote areas.
Outcomes of Good Culturally Safe Care
Effective culturally safe palliative care may:
- improve trust and engagement
- improve symptom management
- improve ACP uptake
- reduce avoidable hospitalisations
- improve quality of life
- support culturally meaningful dying
- improve bereavement experiences
- reduce intergenerational trauma.
Key Resources
- Palliative Care Australia Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Resources
- Advance Care Planning Australia
- CareSearch Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Resources
- Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet – Palliative Care and End-of-Life Care
- Caring at Home Project – Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Resources
- Rural and Remote Health Journal – Indigenous Palliative Care Review