MEDICOLEGAL

Sexual Boundaries in the Doctor–Patient Relationship

https://www.medicalboard.gov.au/codes-guidelines-policies/sexual-boundaries-guidelines.aspx


🔷 GENERAL OVERVIEW

  • Sexual misconduct:
    • Is a breach of the doctor–patient relationship
    • Undermines community trust and professional standards
    • Can result in long-term harm to patients
    • Is sometimes a criminal offence
  • Applies to:
    • Current patients
    • Individuals close to patients (e.g., parent of a child patient)
    • Former patients (in some circumstances)

🔹 1. THE FOUNDATION OF THE DOCTOR–PATIENT RELATIONSHIP

1.1 TRUST

  • Central to good medical practice
  • Patients must:
    • Trust doctors to act in their best interests
    • Feel safe, respected, and free from exploitation
  • Sexual misconduct represents a serious violation of that trust
  • Results in:
    • Psychological harm
    • Compromised medical care
    • Loss of community confidence in the profession

1.2 GOOD COMMUNICATION

  • Prevents misunderstandings
  • Components of effective communication:
    • Active listening to patients
    • Respecting patient values and preferences
    • Explaining nature and need for all examinations/treatments
    • Confirming patient understanding
    • Regularly updating patient on progress

🔹 2. WHY BREACHING SEXUAL BOUNDARIES IS UNETHICAL AND HARMFUL

  • Power imbalance: Doctor holds authority; patient may be vulnerable or dependent
  • Trust violation: Medical care must be solely for patient benefit
  • Patient safety: Sexual behaviour from a doctor can be emotionally/physically harmful
  • Objectivity: Romantic involvement erodes clinical judgement
  • Public confidence: Misconduct deters people from seeking care or sharing personal information

🔹 3. BREACHES OF SEXUAL BOUNDARIES

3.1 EXAMPLES (Spectrum of behaviours)

  • Seeking or engaging in sexual relationships with patients
  • Conducting non-indicated physical exams
  • Behaviours of a sexual nature:
    • Sexual remarks/jokes/innuendo
    • Flirtation or seductive conduct
    • Sexual touching
    • Sexual acts in front of patients
    • Comments designed to arouse sexual desire
  • Inquiring about sexual history when not relevant to clinical care
  • Sexual exploitation, harassment, or assault

3.2 OTHER INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOURS

  • Requesting unnecessary undressing
  • Providing inadequate draping/privacy
  • Engaging in sexual relationships with:
    • Patient’s parent, spouse, carer, or family
    • Former patients, particularly where prior vulnerability exists

🔹 4. MAINTAINING SEXUAL BOUNDARIES WITH CURRENT PATIENTS

Warning signs (for doctors):

  • Sharing personal/sexual details with a patient
  • Fantasising or daydreaming about a patient
  • Accepting or initiating social invitations
  • Scheduling non-urgent after-hours visits
  • Patient behaviours:
    • Sexual comments/language
    • Excessive personal questioning
    • Over-affection or giving gifts

Recommended action:

  • Re-establish professional boundaries constructively
  • Consult indemnity insurer or senior colleague
  • Consider transferring care if objectivity is compromised
  • Do so sensitively, to avoid further distress to the patient

🔹 5. SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH FORMER PATIENTS

May still be unethical if:

  • Exploits prior trust, vulnerability, or emotional dependence

Board will assess:

  • Length and intensity of previous care
  • Nature of treatment (psychological/emotional care especially relevant)
  • Time since last clinical contact
  • Circumstances of relationship formation
  • Vulnerability and dependence of former patient

🔹 6. SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH INDIVIDUALS CLOSE TO PATIENTS

  • Includes parent, spouse, carer, guardian, family member
  • May affect:
    • Clinical objectivity
    • Patient trust and quality of care
  • Board considerations:
    • Duration/type of care
    • Emotional dependence of the individual
    • Doctor’s use of knowledge or influence from patient’s care
    • Importance of patient’s treatment to the family member

🔹 7. PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS

Before examination:

  • Must be clinically justified
  • Obtain informed consent
  • Explain:
    • Reason for exam
    • What it involves
    • Rights to refuse
  • Allow undressing/dressing in private
  • Do not assist unless patient requests help
  • Offer presence of a support person

During examination:

  • Respect signs of withdrawn or uncertain consent
  • Use draping to preserve dignity
  • Use gloves for genital/internal exams
    • Exception: some paediatric external exams
  • Minimise time patient is undressed

7.1 USE OF OBSERVERS (CHAPERONES)

  • Especially in intimate examinations (breasts, genitals, rectal, vaginal)
  • Observer should be:
    • Qualified (e.g., nurse)
    • Acceptable to patient
    • Aware of role and respect confidentiality
  • Patient may decline an observer
    • Doctor can proceed, or help find another practitioner

🔹 8. SOCIAL MEDIA AND DIGITAL COMMUNICATION

  • Maintain same professional standards as in-person
  • Do not use social media to:
    • Flirt, initiate sexual/inappropriate relationships
  • Social media can blur personal–professional boundaries
  • Redirect patients who initiate informal contact to clinical channels

🔹 9. OBLIGATION TO REPORT SEXUAL MISCONDUCT

  • Mandatory notification (under National Law) to AHPRA if:
    • A health practitioner poses serious risk due to sexual misconduct
  • Applies to:
    • Registered practitioners
    • Employers
    • Education providers
  • Some exceptions exist in WA and QLD
  • Voluntary notifications also encouraged as part of professional duty

🧾 DEFINITIONS (Key terms)

  • Sexual relationship: any relationship with a sexual element
  • Sexual exploitation: abuse of professional power for sexual gratification
  • Sexual harassment: unwanted behaviour of a sexual nature (e.g., comments, touching, exposure)
  • Intimate examination: typically involves breasts/genitalia/rectal exams (patient perspective matters)
  • Informed consent: voluntary and fully informed agreement
  • Substitute decision-maker: legal authority to consent on behalf of patient lacking capacity

⚖️ LEGAL FRAMEWORK & ENFORCEMENT

  • Issued under Section 39 of the National Law
  • Used in regulatory proceedings to define appropriate conduct
  • Reviewed every 5 years (current as of December 2018)
  • Breaches may lead to:
    • Investigation by AHPRA or Medical Board
    • Suspension, deregistration, or referral to police

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.