Melanoma

Skin Neoplasia Naevi and Melanoma
Naevi = hamartoma of the skin.
With respect to melanocytes, a benign neoplasm
Melanoma
Risk Factors:
- UV Exposure
- Sun Exposure and history of Sunburns
- Sun sensitivity
- Regular tanning bed use before age 30 years
- Caucasian skin
- Fair skin that burns easily
- common in very fair skin (skin phototype 1 and 2)
- may occur in those who tan quite easily (phototype 3)
- rare in brown or black skin (phototype 4-6).
- Fair skin that burns easily
- Latitude related
- Immunosuppression
- Congenital Melanocytic Nevi
- Melanoma Family History
- First degree relative increases risk 8-12 fold
- Blistering Sunburn more than once as child
VERY HIGH RISK:
- Previous invasive melanoma or melanoma in situ(especially <40 years old)
- Previous nonmelanoma skin cancer
- Multiple (>5) atypical naevi (funny-looking moles or moles that are histologically dysplastic)
- Strong family history of melanoma with 2 or more first-degree relatives affected
- Atypical Nevus syndrome with Family History of Melanoma
- Giant Congenital Melanocytic Nevi (>15-20 cm)
- Precursor Lesions
- Lentigo maligna
- Congenital neoplastic nevi
- Clark’s melanocytic nevi (Dysplastic Nevus)
Less strong factors include
- blue or green eyes
- red or blond hair
- indoor occupation with outdoor recreation
- signs of sun damage.
Extrinsic Risk Factors for Melanoma | ||
---|---|---|
Solar UV radiation | [8,11,12] | |
● Intermittent sun exposure | RR: 1.61 (95% CI: 1.31–1.99) | [9,14] |
● Sunburn (especially in childhood) | RR 2.03 (95% CI: 1.73–2.37) | [9,15,16,17] |
● Sunbathing (‘ever’ intentional sun exposure) | RR 1.44 (95% CI: 1.18–1.76) | [11,19] |
Artificial UV radiation | ||
● ‘ever’ sunbed use <35 years old | RR: 1.2 (95% CI: 1.08–1.34) RR: 1.59 (95% CI: 1.36–1.85) | [17,19,20,21] |
Lifestyle factors | ||
● High lifetime intake of spirits | HR: 1.47 (95% CI = 1.08–1.99) | [24,25] |
Immunosuppression | ||
● HIV in Caucasians | IR > 10 fold increased | [26] |
● (renal) Transplant recipients | RR: 3.6 (95% CI: 3.1–4.1) | [27,28,29,30] |
● Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma | RR: 2.4 (95% CI: 1.8–3.2) | [31] |
● Chronic lymphocytic leukemia | RR: 3.1 (95% CI: 2.1–4.4) | [31] |
Intrinsic Risk Factors for Melanoma | ||
---|---|---|
Phenotype | ||
● Fitzpatrick phototype: | [33] | |
III vs. IV | RR: 1.77 (95% CI: 1.23–2.56) | |
II vs. IV | RR: 1.84 (95% CI: 1.43–2.36) | |
I vs. IV | RR: 2.09 (95% CI: 1.67–2.58 | |
● Light eye color: | [33] | |
blue vs. dark | RR: 1.47 (95% CI: 1.28–1.69) | |
green vs. dark | RR: 1.61 (95% CI: 1.06–2.45) | |
● Light hair color: | [33] | |
red vs. dark | RR: 3.64 (95% CI: 2.56–5.37) | |
blond vs. dark | RR: 1.96 (95% CI: 1.41–2.74) | |
light brown vs. dark | RR: 1.62 (95% CI: 1.11–2.34) | |
● Freckles | RR: 2.10 (95% CI: 1.80–2.45) | [34] |
● High nevi count (>100) | RR: 6.89 (95% CI: 4.63–10.25) | [35] |
● Presence of atypical nevi | RR: 6.36 (95% CI: 3.80–10.33) | [35] |
Sex | ||
● Male sex | IR per 100,000: male vs. female 29.3 vs. 18.0 | [40,41] |
Medical history | ||
● Personal history of | ||
melanoma | O:E: 8.61 (95% CI: 8.31–8.92) | [46,47] |
BCC (yes vs. no) | 2.46% vs. 0.37% | [46] |
● Family history of melanoma | RR: 1.74 (95% CI: 1.41–2.14) | [34,48,50] |
● Preceding malignancy: | [65,66] | |
Breast cancer | SIR: 5.13 (95% CI: 3.91–6.73) | |
Thyroid cancer | SIR: 16.2 (95% CI: 5.22–50.2) | |
Head and neck cancer | SIR: 5.62 (95% CI: 1.41–22.50) | |
Soft tissue cancer | SIR: 8.68 (95% CI: 2.17–34.70) | |
Cervical cancer | SIR: 12.5 (95% CI: 3.14–50.20) | |
Kidney/urinary tract cancer | SIR: 3.19 (95% CI: 1.52–6.68) | |
Prostate cancer | SIR: 4.36 (95% CI: 2.63–7.24) | |
Acute myeloid leukemia | SIR: 6.44 (95% CI: 2.42–17.20) | |
Chronic lymphatic leukemia | SIR: 2.74 (95% CI, 2.43–3.08) | [67] |
Genetic conditions and susceptibility genes | ||
● Familial melanoma | [52,53,54] | |
● CDKN2A, CDK4, BAP1, MITF, TERT, ACD, TERF2IP, POT1 mutation | [56,57,59,60] | |
● MC1R | ||
one variant: | OR: 1.41 (95% CI: 1.07–1.87) | |
≥two variants | OR: 2.51 (95% CI: 1.83–3.44) | |
Mixed cancer syndromes | ||
● PTEN, BRCA1, BRCA2, RB1, BAP1, TP53 mutation | [56,61,62,63] |
Epidemiology:
- 1 – 3% of childhood cancers
- Females 14/100,000, males 9/100,000. Difference is in the distribution on the legs
Skin Cancer Risk Assessment – Routine History Questions
When assessing a patient’s skin cancer risk (e.g. in general practice or skin check clinic), include the following key history domains:
🔹 1. Personal History of Skin Cancer
- Have you ever been diagnosed with:
- Melanoma?
- Basal cell carcinoma (BCC)?
- Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)?
- Solar keratoses (actinic keratoses)?
🔹 2. Family History
- Any first-degree relatives with melanoma or other skin cancers?
- Ask about age of onset and number of family members affected.
🔹 3. Phenotypic Risk Factors
- What is your natural skin type? (e.g. Fitzpatrick I–VI)
- Do you have:
- Fair skin that burns easily?
- Red or blonde hair?
- Blue or green eyes?
- Freckles?
- How do you react to sun exposure (burn vs tan)?
🔹 4. Naevus Profile
- Do you have a large number of moles (>50)?
- Do you have any atypical/dysplastic moles?
- Any congenital large naevi?
🔹 5. UV Exposure History
- Have you had significant sun exposure, especially:
- As a child?
- During outdoor work or hobbies?
- Have you ever had blistering sunburns, particularly in childhood or adolescence?
- Any solarium or tanning bed use?
🔹 6. Immunosuppression
- Are you on immunosuppressive medications?
- Any organ transplant, HIV, or hematological malignancy?
Examination Findings
- A: asymmetry
- B: border irregular – e.g. growing a peninsular
- C: colour – 3 or more, colour not symmetrical, areas of black, variegated
- D: dimension > 0.6 cm (although you can get smaller melanomas, and most larger lesions aren‟t melanomas
- E: elevated – dermal penetration (but most are initially flat – superficial spreading melanomas)
- Usually asymptomatic: don‟t bleed until late (ie take bleeding seriously) and don‟t usually itch



Watch out for:
- Changes: but moles can change for lots of reasons. And patients aren‟t good at detecting changes (either miss them or think they‟ve changed when they haven‟t)
- Bleeding, itching and halo (although can get two tone moles – OK if symmetrical)
Progression:
- Radial Growth Phase: initially growth is along the dermo-epidermal junction and within the epidermis
- Vertical Growth Phase: Growth into the dermis malignant cells in contact with lymphatics and capillaries metastasis
- Nodular melanoma: bad news
- Acral Letigenous Melanoma: on palms and soles
Differential:
- Benign mole
- BCC
- Seborrheic keratosis: stuck on appearance, monotone and symmetrical, greasy surface, numerous
- Angiokeratomas
- Dermatofibroma: firm, round, monotone
- Any lesion under a nail (usually thumb) is a melanoma or SCC until proven otherwise
Pathology:
- Features of malignant cells: irregular, hyperchromatic, large N:C ratio, mitoses (blackberry nuclei), abnormal number of mitosis
- Radical/Superficial/Horizontal growth phase: cells in contact with dermis, don‟t metastasise
- Vertical growth: mass of atypical melanocytes infiltrating dermis, lymphocytes, not necessarily pigmented, metastasises
- Will always have junctional activity. If they only exist deeper in the dermis then they‟re not malignant.
Pathology report
- Diagnosis of primary melanoma
- Breslow thickness to the nearest 0.1 mm
- Clark level of invasion
- Margins of excision i.e. the normal tissue around the tumour
- Mitotic rate – a measure of how fast the cells are proliferating
- Whether or not there is ulceration
Evaluation
- Melanoma metastases
- Lymph Node exam
- Full skin exam
- Chest XRay
- Labs considered above stage IA (and in all cases of Stage III and IV)
- Complete Blood Count (CBC)
- Liver Function Tests (LFT or hepatic panel)
- Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH)
- Advanced imaging (indicated for stage III, IV)
- CT Head, chest and Abdomen and/or
- PET Scan (eyes to thighs)
Prognosis:
- Breslow tumour thickness
- a strong predictor of outcome; the thicker the melanoma, the more likely it is to metastasise (spread).
- > 0.76 cm bad
- 5year survival related to tumor depth
- Survival 99%: Depth < 0.85mm
- Survival 80%: Depth 0.85 to 1.69mm
- Survival 70%: Depth 1.70 to 3.64mm
- Survival 40%: Depth > 3.65mm
- a strong predictor of outcome; the thicker the melanoma, the more likely it is to metastasise (spread).
- Clarke‟s levels
- deeper the Clark level, the greater the risk of metastasis
- Level 1: Epidermis
- Level 2: Reaches papillary Dermis
- Level 3: Fills papillary Dermis ~ Breslow 0.76, bigger = worse
- Level 4: Enters reticular Dermis
- Level 5: Penetrates subcutaneous fat
- Ulceration > 3 mm (bad)
- High mitotic rate (bad)
- Regression an indication of metastasis (bad)
- Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (bad)
Treatment: surgical excision
Summary: Early 2 mm excision biopsy for diagnosis → WLE margins matched to Breslow → consider SLNB >1 mm or high-risk thin lesions → stage-appropriate imaging and MDT-guided systemic therapy → structured long-term surveillance and sun-safety counselling.
1. Initial Diagnosis: Excisional Biopsy
Purpose: Confirm melanoma diagnosis and determine Breslow thickness for treatment planning.
Preferred Technique: Elliptical Excision Biopsy
- Margin: 2 mm peripheral margin.
- Orientation: Along relaxed skin tension lines.
- Deep margin: Includes upper subcutis.
- Benefits: Enables accurate Breslow depth, margin assessment, and histological staging.
Why Shave or Punch Biopsies Are Less Preferred
- Risk of under-sampling (misses depth).
- Inaccurate Breslow thickness if base is transected.
- Higher false-negative rate and margin positivity.
- Punch: 23% false negatives
- Shave: 4.5%
- Elliptical excision: 1.7%
When Shave/Punch May Be Acceptable
- If full-thickness lesion removal is achieved.
- Scenarios:
- Small, thin, or flat lesions (e.g. suspected melanoma in situ).
- Acral or cosmetically sensitive sites (e.g. face, eyelid, nail, lip).
- Large lesions unsuitable for elliptical excision in one stage.
Technique Requirements (If Used):
- Aim for full-thickness removal:
- Margins: ~1–3 mm in all directions.
- Depth: to upper subcutis, not just dermis.
- Do NOT do superficial shaves or partial punches.
- Label clearly as “excisional biopsy” on pathology request form.
- Ensure timely wide local excision (WLE) is arranged if melanoma confirmed.
Guideline Evidence:
- Grade C: Deep shave (saucerisation) or full-thickness punch acceptable in selected cases.
Bottom Line:
- “Avoid shave/punch biopsy” = partly true.
- Gold standard = elliptical excisional biopsy.
- Deep shave or full-thickness punch is acceptable if:
- Whole lesion is removed.
- Depth and margins are preserved.
- Pathology can confidently stage.
- Deep shave or full-thickness punch is acceptable if:
2. Definitive Treatment: Wide Local Excision (WLE)
Breslow Thickness Determines Excision Margins
Breslow Thickness | Lateral WLE Margin | Deep Margin |
---|---|---|
Melanoma in situ | 5 mm (up to 10 mm for lentigo maligna) | To fascia |
≤ 1 mm | 1 cm | To fascia |
1.01 – 2 mm | 1–2 cm (aim for 2 cm) | To fascia |
2.01 – 4 mm | 2 cm | To fascia |
> 4 mm | 2 cm | To fascia |
3. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB)
When to Offer:
- Breslow >1.0 mm (standard recommendation).
- Breslow 0.8–1.0 mm with high-risk features:
- Ulceration
- Clark level IV/V (less commonly used)
- Mitotic rate ≥1/mm²
- Lymphovascular invasion
- Younger patients
Procedure:
- Timing: Prior to or at same time as WLE.
- Involves radioactive tracer or dye for lymphatic mapping.
- Purpose: Prognostic and staging value, not therapeutic.
- Positive SLN: Upgrade to Stage III; triggers staging and MDT input.
SLNB Positivity Rates by Thickness:
Melanoma Thickness | Node Involvement Risk | SLNB Indicated? |
In situ | Negligible | No |
< 0.75 mm | <5% | No |
0.75–1.0 mm | 5–10% | Yes, if high-risk |
1.0–4.0 mm | 15–25% | Yes |
> 4.0 mm | 25–40% | Yes |
4. Regional Lymph Node Assessment & CLND
Complete Lymph Node Dissection (CLND):
- Indications:
- SLNB positive.
- Clinically apparent lymph node disease.
- Aim: Regional control; reduces recurrence.
Prognosis by SLN Status:
Condition | 5-Year Survival | Prognostic Value |
SLN Negative | 90.2% | High |
SLN Positive | 72.3% | Moderate |
CLND at detection | 72.3% | Early advantage |
CLND when clinical | 52.4% | Worse outcome |
5. Staging Investigations
Stage | Routine Imaging |
In situ | Not required |
IA | Not required |
IB–IIA | No routine imaging; consider nodal US if concern |
IIB–IIC | CT chest/abdomen/pelvis, +/- brain MRI or PET/CT |
III | PET/CT, brain MRI, serum LDH |
IV | PET/CT, brain MRI, serum LDH |
- PET/CT has better whole-body sensitivity compared to CT for Stage III/IV.
- Brain MRI is more sensitive than CT for CNS metastases, and is preferred over CT brain in advanced stages.
- LDH is not diagnostic, but included as a prognostic marker in AJCC staging for Stage IV.
6. Adjuvant & Systemic Therapy
Stage III / resected IIB–IIC:
- Immunotherapy: Nivolumab or Pembrolizumab.
- BRAF mutation: BRAF + MEK inhibitors.
Stage IV / unresectable:
- First-line: Immunotherapy.
- BRAF-mutant: Consider targeted therapy.
- Enrolment in clinical trials encouraged.
7. Follow-Up & Surveillance
Stage | Clinical Exam Schedule | Imaging |
---|---|---|
In situ | Yearly with GP/Derm | None |
IA | Yearly | None |
IB–IIA | 6–12 monthly (years 1–5), then yearly | Consider node US |
IIB–IIC | 3–6 monthly (years 1–5), then 6–12 monthly | Annual PET/CT/CT + brain MRI |
III | 3–4 monthly (years 1–2), 6 monthly (years 3–5), then yearly | PET/CT or CT every 6–12 months |
IV | Individualised | As per MDT/oncologist |
Components of Follow-Up:
- Examine scar and regional nodes.
- General skin check.
- Full physical exam.
- Mole mapping for high-risk patients.
8. Sun Protection & Patient Education
Avoid peak UV hours (10 a.m. – 4 p.m.).
- Seek shade; wear protective clothing and wide-brimmed hats.
- Use wrap-around sunglasses.
- Apply broad-spectrum SPF ≥ 30 sunscreen.
- Avoid tanning and solariums.
- Promote regular self-examination and professional skin checks.
Educate on monthly skin self-checks using the ABCDE approach:
- Asymmetry
- Border irregularity
- Colour variation
- Diameter >6 mm
- Evolution (changing in size, shape, colour, or symptoms)
Encourage checking:
- Back (use mirror or partner)
- Scalp
- Soles of feet
- Under nails
Professional Skin Checks
Advise:
- At least annual full-skin checks by a GP or dermatologist if moderate-to-high risk
- More frequent reviews if:
- Multiple atypical naevi
- Personal/family history of melanoma
- History of high UV exposure
Patient Education & Resources
- Provide brochures or links to:
- Cancer Council Australia – Skin Cancer Prevention
- SunSmart program
- Reinforce that early detection = high cure rates in melanoma
9. When to Refer to Specialist or MDT
- Lesions in cosmetically or functionally complex areas.
- Large lesions requiring grafts or flaps.
- Positive or incomplete biopsy margins.
- Breslow > 1 mm (for SLNB and MDT planning).
- Stage IIB or higher, nodal involvement, or metastases.
- Patients requiring systemic therapy or trial enrolment.
Superficial spreading melanoma
- grows outward in epidermis
- lots of colour variation in lesion
- 70% melanomas
- the malignant cells tend to stay within the tissue of origin, the epidermis, in an ‘in-situ’ phase for a prolonged period (months to decades).
- At first, superficial spreading melanoma grows horizontally on the skin surface (radial growth phase. ),
- An unknown proportion of superficial spreading melanoma become invasive,
- melanoma cells cross the basement membrane of the epidermis and malignant cells enter the dermis.
- A rapidly-growing nodular melanoma can arise within superficial spreading melanoma and start to proliferate more deeply within the skin.


- The most frequently observed dermoscopic features of superficial spreading melanoma are:
- Asymmetric structure and colours
- Atypical pigment network
- Blue-grey structures
- Multiple colours (5-6)
Lentigo maligna
- “Hutchinson melanotic freckle”
- Malignant change of melanocytes along the epidermis border but no infiltration.
- slow growing, intraepidermal, Takes years to become invasive
- multicoloured in time
- sun exposed areas in elderly
- commonly face
- tan macule
- slowly enlarges and develops a geographic shape
- Now showing up on younger people – excise before they get too big



Nodular melanoma
- trunk and limbs, young adult to middle age
- “blueberry” like nodule may be associated
- Isolated globules
- Blue-grey veil
- White streaks
- Irregular linear or dotted vessels
- Elevated, Firm, Growing
- Early: symmetrical, non-pigmented, even colour, small diameter, grows vertically, often mistaken for haemangioma or pyogemnic granuloma

Acral lentiginous melanoma
- -palms, soles and distal phalanges
- tends to be much deeper than is suspected from its flat nature.
- Dermoscopically
- broad parallel ridge pattern rather than the benign parallel furrow pattern
- asymmetry and other features of superficial melanoma may be present.
- Little white dots on the ridges are sweat ducts (acrosyringia)
- -poor prognosis
- -more common in dark skin

Desmoplastic melanoma
- rare, aggressive
- often ooks like a scar
- most non-pigmented
Amelanocytic melanoma
- odd-looking pink lesion.
- small amount of focal and irregular pigmentation, often on the periphery of the lesion.
- Atypical vascularity may be a clue, with linear, dotted, corkscrew or polymorphous vessels


Melanocytic Naevi
- Normal skin: epidermal cells, plus melanocytes, Langerhans cells (Antigen Presenting Cells –APC), prickle cells and merkel cells (sensory receptors)
- Benign melanocytic naevi:
- Junctional:
- epidermis only
- early active growth to <0.5 cm
- Can be non-pigmented
- Overgrowth of melanocytes in nests along the junction of the dermis and epidermis.
- Compound:
- epidermis and dermis
- older active growth (moles on palms, soles and genitalia stay junctional)
- Intradermal:
- stopped growing, loss of tyrosinase
- small and pale.
- Don‟t have contact with the epidermal junction (ie are deep).
- Don‟t become malignant – must have junctional activity to do this
- Junctional:
Dysplastic melanocytic naevi (Atypical Mole Syndrome):
- Uncontrolled proliferation without malignancy
- (> 100 with at least one Dysplastic more or a mole > 0.5 cm)
- Mostly benign with possibility of malignancy
- If have > 100 moles, 100 to 200 times normal risk
- Risk of melanoma proportional to the number of moles, plus family history and degree of atypia
- Management:
- Self checking each month
- Annual doctor check (to make sure they’re self checking)
- Most moles that change aren’t melanoma, but if suspicious need to remove it

Halo naevi
- Fairly common, especially in kids.
- Depigmented symmetrical halo around the mole, but the mole is normal (cf depigmented melanoma where pigmented lesion is not normal and not central)
- Can occur more frequently when has melanoma elsewhere or when being treated for advanced melanoma. – do a full skin check
- Unknown trigger, immune system attacks the naevus and de-pigments the surrounding skin also
- Halo is 0.5 – 1cm wide, symmetrical
- No treatment required unless atypical features
- Pathogenesis: ?Somatic mutation
- Differential:
- Melanoma
- Dermatofibroma: feels firm
- Seborrheic keratosis: altered texture

Blue naevus
- Melanocytic naevus where the naevus cells are located deep within the dermis
- Incomplete migration of the melanocytes – appears blue due to scattering of light
- More common in Asians and women
- Common blue naevus 0.5-1cm, never becomes malignant
- Cellular blue naevus is nodular at least 1cm diameter, rarely can become malignant
- Usually develop late childhood or adolescence, rare at birth
- Diagnose clinically, can excise if unsure , changing appearance, older adult

Atypical/dysplastic melanocytic naevus
- People with 5 or more clinically atypical naevi have a higher risk than the general population of developing melanoma
- An atypical naevus may exhibit the following characteristics:
- Size greater than 5 mm in diameter
- Ill-defined or blurred borders
- Irregular margins resulting in an unusual shape
- Varying shades of color (mostly pink, tan, brown, black)
- Both flat and bumpy components
- Demographics:
- Sporadic Atypical Naevi:
- Affect fair-skinned individuals with light-colored hair and freckles (phototype 1 or 2).
- More common with frequent sun exposure.
- Develop mostly within the first 15 years of life.
- Typically, individuals have 1 to 10 moles larger than 6 mm in diameter.
- Familial Atypical Naevi: Associated with FAMMM syndrome (Familial Atypical Multiple Mole and Melanoma). Characteristics include:
- A first or second-degree relative diagnosed with melanoma at a young age (< 40 years)
- A large number of naevi (often more than 50), some atypical
- Histopathologically dysplastic naevi
- Several hundred atypical naevi may be present.
- Sporadic Atypical Naevi:

Importance of Atypical Naevi
- Individuals with 5 or more clinically atypical naevi have a sixfold increased risk of melanoma.
- FAMMM syndrome significantly increases melanoma risk.
Management
- Suspicious or changing naevi should be removed by excision biopsy.
- should be taught how to self-examine their skin for new skin lesions and for changes to existing moles
- numerous moles should visit their family doctor or dermatologist regularly for a thorough skin check.
- keep photographic records of melanocytic naevi
- Careful sun protection
- Avoid excessive sun exposure and sunburn
- dress up
- use a SPF50+ sunscreen when outdoors in the middle of the day or for prolonged periods
Epidermal Naevi
- Defined according to their predominant cell type
- Circumscribed distribution over a part of the body surface, usually dermatomal
- Any size, never cross the midline, uncommon on face and head
- Sebaceous Naevi: hamartomas of predominantly sebaceous glands. Usually on scalp (lesion is bald). Raised, velvety surface, present at birth, usually small. Risk of basal-cell carcinoma, but no longer prophylactically excised
- Dermal Melanocytic naevus (Mongolian spot): macular blue-grey pigmentation present at birth, over sacral area in Mongoloid and some other races. Looks like a large bruise. Rarely persist into adulthood.
- Congenital naevocellular naevus:
- Small is < 1.5 cm, intermediate = 1.5 – 20 cm, large is > 20 cm.
- If over lower sacrum –> spinabifida occulta.
- May arise or darken in puberty. Large ones have risk of melanoma
- Spitz naevus:
- appears in early childhood as a firm, round red or reddish brown nodule.
- May bleed and crust. Benign. Local excision.